Coast Range Fawnlily - Center For Plant Conservation
Search / Plant Profile / Erythronium elegans
Plant Profile

Coast Range Fawnlily (Erythronium elegans)

Erythronium elegans in full bloom. Photo Credit: W. Bluhm
  • Global Rank: G2 - Imperiled
  • Legal Status: N/A
  • Family: Liliaceae
  • State: OR
  • Nature Serve ID: 129526
  • Date Inducted in National Collection: 04/01/1990
Description:

Erythronium elegans presents something of a paradox. It is a geographically highly restricted, very rare plant, that also an ecological generalist. It has been found growing in only five localities, all in the northern Coast Range of Oregon. Even within particular populations, they can be found growing quite contentedly in a wide variety of habitats: from bare soil to completely vegetated ground; in either full sun or deep shade; growing in dry shale road cuts and saturated Sphagnum moss. Without careful management, the elegant fawn lily may one day be found nowhere. With such a low number of populations, the species is susceptible to extinction due to habitat destruction and random events. The species is listed as Threatened by the State of Oregon, but all populations are found on Federal or private land, and consequently, there is no real legal protection. Presently, the US Fish and Wildlife Service recognize this species as a "Species of Concern". If the coast-range fawn lily were to receive listing under the Endangered Species Act, four populations would fall under jurisdiction of the federal government, since they are located on federal land. Listing is especially critical since two of the most recently discovered populations are either in or adjacent to potential timber sales on federal land (Guerrant 1999). The Nature Conservancy and the Oregon Native Plant Society are presently monitoring the remaining population on private land.

Where is Coast Range Fawnlily (Erythronium elegans) located in the wild?

Habitat:

Northern Coast Range in Oregon, in open meadows, rocky cliffs, brushland, open to closed canopy coniferous forests, and edges of sphagnum bogs (Grenier 1991).

Distribution:

OR: Coast Range

States & Provinces:

Coast Range Fawnlily can be found in Oregon

Which CPC Partners conserve Coast Range Fawnlily (Erythronium elegans)?

CPC's Plant Sponsorship Program provides long term stewardship of rare plants in our National Collection. We are so grateful for all our donors who have made the Plant Sponsorship Program so successful. We are in the process of acknowledging all our wonderful plant sponsorship donors on our website. This is a work in progress and will be updated regularly.

Conservation Actions

  • 09/10/2020
  • Demographic Research

A six-year demography study compared population growth between one presumably healthy population and a population believed to be in decline. Each population was subdivided into two focal populations, and analysis showed that one focal population was growing vigorously, one was in serious decline, and the remaining two populations were stable (Guerrant 1999).

  • 09/10/2020
  • Orthodox Seed Banking

Seed from 3 of the 5 populations stored at The Berry Botanic Garden.

  • 09/10/2020
  • Seed Collection

Seed from 3 of the 5 populations stored at The Berry Botanic Garden.

Nature Serve Biotics
  • 05/02/2017

Endemic to high elevation peaks in the northern Coast Range of Oregon, Erythronium elegans is known from approximately 12 extant occurrences. Just two occurrences are on lands managed solely or primarily for conservation purposes, although a few others are on Federal lands on which the species is designated Sensitive. Approximately 9,000-15,000 individuals are known. Habitat disturbance from logging is a threat at some sites. Other relatively low-level threats include road construction, recreation, collection, elk herbivory, and habitat degradation due to Douglas fir blight. The species appears to be somewhat of a poor competitor that does best in sites with a sparse herbaceous layer, although it seems to be less specific in its canopy cover and soil moisture requirements. It is unknown whether E. elegans has always been rare, or has declined from historical levels.

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Plant and habitat destruction due to logging. Herbivory and grazing. Fungal infection (Guerrant 1999). Plant collection for horticultural purposes.

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

5 populations. Four are on federal land, and one is privately owned but monitored by The Nature Conservancy and the Oregon Native Plant Society (Guerrant 1992). Population sizes range ""100's in flower"", ""100-1000"", ""300"", to ""thousands."" This large population numbering in the ""thousands"" contains 95% of the total number of individuals (ONHP 2000).

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

A six-year demography study compared population growth between one presumably healthy population and a population believed to be in decline. Each population was subdivided into two focal populations, and analysis showed that one focal population was growing vigorously, one was in serious decline, and the remaining two populations were stable (Guerrant 1999).

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Seed from 3 of the 5 populations stored at The Berry Botanic Garden. Listed as Threatened by the State of Oregon. Monitoring is being conducted by the Nature Conservancy and the Oregon Native Plant Society at the one population located on private land.

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Initiate a comprehensive, highly detailed, GIS based inventory of the extent and density of E. elegans, including data on stage distribution and microhabitat types (Guerrant 1999). Establish a long-term monitoring scheme that is more extensive and less labor intensive than a demographic study (Guerrant 1999). Ensure that management actions for other species (e.g.: mowing or burning to maintain habitat for Viola adunca, larval food plant for Oregon silverspot butterfly) do not adversely affect E. elegans (Guerrant 1999). Monitor elk populations in order to make informed management decisions concerning herbivory (Guerrant1999). Monitor Douglas Fir blight as it could adversely affect E. elegans (Guerrant 1999). If possible, determine whether Erythronium elegans was once more common and widespread. Are the low population numbers due to human-caused disturbances (i.e.. habitat destruction) or have population numbers always been low (i.e.. narrow endemic) Study the gene flow between populations. Determine if inbreeding or high clonality of the populations is a threat to the species' continued survival. Determine what light levels/canopy cover is best for vigorous growth and manage the land to increase or maintain suitable habitat.

Edward Guerrant, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Collect and store seeds from across the species range. Determine germination requirements. Determine effective propagation and re-introduction protocols.

MORE

Be the first to post an update!

Nomenclature
Taxon Erythronium elegans
Authority Hammond and Chambers
Family Liliaceae
CPC Number 1839
ITIS 196371
USDA EREL13
Common Names Coast Range fawn-lily | Coast Range trout-lily | dog-tooth violet | elegant fawn-lily | elegant trout-lily | Coast Range fawnlily
Associated Scientific Names Erythronium elegans
Distribution OR: Coast Range
State Rank
State State Rank
Oregon S2
Ecological Relationships

Erythronium elegans is a narrowly endemic plant. Only five populations have ever been found, including two that were discovered in the last decade. All are found in the Oregon Coast Range.Erythronium elegans is found in a wide variety of habitats. It has been found on bare soil and completely vegetated ground, in full sun and deep shade, in Sphagnum moss and in shale road-cuts (Guerrant 1992). Species associated with Erythronium elegans include Erythronium grandiflorum var. pallidum, Fragaria sp., Lupinus sp., and various grasses. It also occurs in open coniferous forests under Picea, Pseudotsuga, and Thuja. (Grenier 1991)In an extensive demographic study, it was observed that the site with the greatest population growth had, on average, the lowest levels of phosphorous, potassium, calcium, magnesium, ammonium, and nitrate in the soil (6 of the 8 nutrients tested for). One hypothesis is that Erythronium elegans is generally at a competitive disadvantage relative to its associated species. If this is the case, E. elegans may do better in poor soil conditions where it may have the ability to obtain sufficient nutrients where other taxa do not do as well (Guerrant 1999).A complex interaction between the amount of nutrients, light levels, herbivory, and ground cover most likely determine where Erythronium elegans will be successful. In four sites that were observed, the two sites with stable populations were not shaded and were heavily grazed by elk. The site with a high growth rate was under young trees, and therefore protected from elk grazing, and the ground was covered by Douglas fir needles. The site with declining numbers was under a closed mature canopy, so was heavily shaded, and the ground had a well developed moss and herbaceous plant layer. Given that E. elegans may be a poor competitor, Guerrant (1999) suggests that intense competition from the herbaceous plant layer may outweigh the advantage of escaping elk herbivory. Available light levels may also be influencing plant vigor and survival.Each spring, flowers and leaves emerge. Throughout the growing season, the leaves produce energy, which is stored in the bulb for growth the following spring. In the demographic study (Guerrant 1999), as much as 13% of the population was observed to be dormant in any one year. Some plants were observed to remain dormant for up to three years.In one site, sexual reproduction was relatively low compared to the other observed sites. The reason for this decreased sexual reproduction is not known. However, that site has high vegetative reproduction relative to the other sites. It is possible that the plants are physiologically and morphologically responding in an adaptive manner to whatever is causing sexual reproduction to be limited (Guerrant 1999). Although vegetative reproduction increases plant numbers, it may not be entirely beneficial. A population comprised of many clones may not be as resilient to climate and habitat changes as a smaller population with more genetic diversity.

Photos
Pollinators
Common Name Name in Text Association Type Source InteractionID
Bees
Bees Confirmed Pollinator Link
Bumble bees Bumble bees Confirmed Pollinator Link

Donate to CPC to Save this Species

CPC secures rare plants for future generations by coordinating on-the-ground conservation and training the next generation of plant conservation professionals. Donate today to help save rare plants from extinction.

Donate Today