Little Amphianthus / Center For Plant Conservation
Search / Plant Profile / Gratiola amphiantha
Plant Profile

Little Amphianthus (Gratiola amphiantha)

Amphianthus pusillus in flower Photo Credit: Hugh and Carol Nourse
  • Global Rank: G2 - Imperiled
  • Legal Status: Federally Threatened
  • Family: Plantaginaceae
  • State: AL, GA, SC
  • Nature Serve ID: 138613
  • Lifeform: Forb/herb
  • Date Inducted in National Collection:
Description:

Aquatic, annual herb with two types of leaves. Floating leaves less than inch (3 - 5 mm) long, oval, paired at the end of a thread-like stem. Submerged leaves in a rosette at the top of a tiny, underwater stem, each leaf less than inch (up to 5 mm) long and with a pointed tip. Flowers less than inch (3-4 mm) long, white to pale purple, with a short tube and 5 spreading lobes; flowers are held between the floating leaves and also among the submerged rosette leaves. Fruit less than ⅛ inch (3 mm) wide, somewhat flattened, with 2 lobes. Pool sprite could be confused with water starwort (Callitriche heterophylla), which also occurs in pools on granite outcrops; its floating leaves are spoon-shaped and in whorls or rosettes rather than pairs; submerged leaves are narrow and scattered along the underwater stem.

Where is Little Amphianthus (Gratiola amphiantha) located in the wild?

Habitat:

Shallow, flat-bottomed depressions (solution pits, vernal pools) on granite outcrops, with thin, sandy or gravelly soils and winter-spring inundation. Pools must be deep enough to hold water for several weeks and must be in full sun.

Distribution:

Piedmont of Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama

States & Provinces:

Little Amphianthus can be found in Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina

Conservation Actions

Nature Serve Biotics
  • 05/02/2017

Restricted to granite outcrops of the southeastern Piedmont (mostly in Georgia). The habitat is limited and fragile; there is a high degree of threat from trash and debris dumping into depressions in the outcrops, off-road vehicle traffic, and quarrying. Comprehensive surveys have been conducted throughout this species' range and, as of 1994, only 57 extant populations were known. Locally, the plants may occur in high densities.

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

granite quarrying recreational use of outcrops fire-building in pools horseback riding cattle trampling eutrophication of pools from cattle droppings development trash dumping off-road-vehicle use

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

Georgia: Approximately 36 extant populations occur in 17 counties; of these, 8 populations are more or less protected in 7 parks and preserves; total acreage of all pools with pool sprite is less than 1 acre. Amphianthus pusillus population presence seems robust at most sites. With the exception of five sites (one extirpation at Bakers Rock and four populations declining toward extirpation Wolf Rock, Rock of Ages, Gray Rock, and Philadelphia Road), Amphianthus pusillus appears to be sustaining previous population levels (Melissa Caspary, pers. comm. 2008). Alabama: Three populations South Carolina: Three populations

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

Melissa Caspary, Ph.D. candidate at the University of Georgia School of ecology, is researching the impacts of exotics species on granite outcrop species, including Amphianthus pusillus. Hilton and Boyd (1996) examined microhabitat requirements, density-fecundity relationships, and microdistribution of Amphianthus pusillus on a granite outcrop in Heard County, Georgia. They found that abiotic features of Amphianthus pusillus habitat varied widely, with water depth varying 93-fold and soil depth 22-fold. There was no relationship between soil depth and Amphianthus fecundity. Density and fecundity of the co-occurring species, Diamorpha smallii, also failed to correlate with Amphianthus pusillus density and fecundity. They concluded that variables considered important in defining Amphianthus habitat at a coarse scale (water, soil depth, etc.) are not as important at the finer scale at which their study was conducted. They speculate that variables such as microsite history, seed predation, and seed bank size are more important at fine scales, and that unoccupied suitable habitat exists within pools. Implications for conservation management: since suitable habitat is difficult to define and may depend on easily disturbed microsite factors, habitat manipulation is not recommended; however, sowing seeds of Amphianthus into pools known to currently or historically support the species may be successful in restoring and producing robust populations.

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

Pool sprite populations are dependent on seasonal inundation and are destroyed by siltation and sedimentation into pools. Therefore, site management must include protection from erosion which deposits silt and debris into pools, and water diversion which leads to permanent drying. Other management recommendations include: Protect granite outcrops from quarrying, trash dumping, and off-road-vehicle use. Direct foot traffic away from rare plant sites and rock pools. Create buffers and limit development around outcrops (Chafin 2007). Traffic from off-road vehicles appears to be the greatest impact at most sites. ATVs are clearly reshaping populations at Camp Meeting Rock, Rock of Ages, Wolf Rock, and other Georgia sites. Grazing from horses and cattle can also seriously impact the pool habitat and introduce exotics (e.g. at 40 Acre Rock). Pool use by Canada geese and bobcats was also observed; it is not clear if this activity could increase eutrophication in pools and lead to population declines. Many outcrops were also observed to be used as dump sites. Impacts from trash may lead to the leaching of chemicals in pools. Within the pools, the introduction of the exotics Ranunculus pusillus and Callitriche heterophylla appear to be placing competition pressure on Amphianthus pusillus, Isoetes melanospora, and Isoetes tegetiformans. Along the margins of the granite outcrop sites, Lonicera japonica and Ligustrum sinense appear to be the major invasive threats.

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

impact of exotic pest plants germination requirements

Melissa Caspary
  • 01/01/2010

The recovery plan(1993)recommends: preservation of genetic stock from acutely threatened populations research on germination requirements

MORE

Be the first to post an update!

Nomenclature
Taxon Gratiola amphiantha
Authority D. Estes & R.L. Small
Family Plantaginaceae
CPC Number 111
ITIS 834190
USDA AMPU7
Duration Annual
Common Names little amphianthus
Associated Scientific Names Amphianthus pusillus | Gratiola amphiantha
Distribution Piedmont of Georgia, South Carolina, Alabama
State Rank
State State Rank
Alabama S1
Georgia S2
South Carolina S1
Ecological Relationships

Photos

Donate to CPC to Save this Species

CPC secures rare plants for future generations by coordinating on-the-ground conservation and training the next generation of plant conservation professionals. Donate today to help save rare plants from extinction.

Donate Today