Tennessee Coneflower / Center For Plant Conservation
Search / Plant Profile / Echinacea tennesseensis
Plant Profile

Tennessee Coneflower (Echinacea tennesseensis)

The bright pink-petaled flower of Echinacea tennesseensis. Photo Credit: Casey Galvin
  • Global Rank: G2 - Imperiled
  • Legal Status: N/A
  • Family: Asteraceae
  • State: TN
  • Nature Serve ID: 159601
  • Lifeform: Forb/herb
  • Date Inducted in National Collection: 02/10/1987
Description:

The Tennessee coneflower is one of the nation's rarest wildflowers (Clark 2000). Known only from five populations within a 14 mile radius in Middle Tennessee, it was the second plant listed as endangered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in June 1979 (USFWS 1989). First listed in the Flora of Tennessee in 1906, the plant was thought to be extinct for half a century until it was rediscovered in 1968 in LaVergne (near Nashville) (USFWS 1989). This site was destroyed by the construction of a trailer park in the 1970's. Two other colonies, discovered in 1972, were destroyed prior to 1975 by housing developments (Shea 1997). The story above illustrates the major threat to E. tennesseensis; Nashville and the surrounding area is undergoing rapid development, encroaching on the coneflower's habitat. Recently, one site was destroyed by the development of the Nashville Superspeedway that opened in 2001.

Where is Tennessee Coneflower (Echinacea tennesseensis) located in the wild?

Habitat:

Cedar glades dominated by red cedar and where the limestone bedrock is either exposed or covered by a thin layer of soil (USFWS 1989).E. tennesseensis is often found with Juniperus virginiana, Petalostemon gattingeri, and Sporobolus vaginiflorus (USFWS 1989).

Distribution:

Populations are distributed among three counties in Tennessee (USFWS 1989, Kartesz 1996).

States & Provinces:

Tennessee Coneflower can be found in Tennessee

Which CPC Partners conserve Tennessee Coneflower (Echinacea tennesseensis)?

CPC's Plant Sponsorship Program provides long term stewardship of rare plants in our National Collection. We are so grateful for all our donors who have made the Plant Sponsorship Program so successful. We are in the process of acknowledging all our wonderful plant sponsorship donors on our website. This is a work in progress and will be updated regularly.

Conservation Actions

Matthew Albrecht
  • 11/30/2022
  • Seed Collection Orthodox Seed Banking

On October 14, 2021, Noah Dell, Matthew Albrecht, and Brad Delfeld of the Missouri Botanical Garden collected seeds of Echinacea tennesseensis for the IMLS Seed Longevity Project. While E. tennesseensis  is no longer a federally listed species, having been delisted in 2011, (as the species was readily reintroduced on limestone glades by seed dispersal) it is endemic to Tennessee's Central Basin and remains a species of conservation concern. We collected 1395 seeds from 75 individual plants and sent 800 seeds to the National Laboratory for Genetic Resource Preservation. The remaining seeds are being maintained at MBG for long-term storage. 

 

Photo Credit: Matthew Albrecht (2014)

Center for Plant Conservation
  • 12/02/2021
  • Reintroduction

One of our natural populations was going to be extirpated. The TN Department of Environment and Conservation needed to establish a new population with the seed source from the extirpated population. We contracted with the CPC at MOBOT to propagate TN coneflower plants from seeds. The plants were then transplanted at property owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers in the vicinity of the extirpated population. The population at the NPS property was planted in the 1970s by a University Professor. The chosen site was within the range of the species and contained similar habitat. The plants at this site have been monitored for many years.

Center for Plant Conservation
  • 12/02/2021
  • Propagation Research

One of our natural populations was going to be extirpated. We needed to establish a new population with the seed source from the extirpated population. We contracted with the CPC at MOBOT to propagate TN coneflower plants from seeds. The plants were then transplanted at property owned by the US Army Corps of Engineers in the vicinity of the extirpated population. The population at the NPS property was planted in the 1970s by a University Professor. The chosen site was within the range of the species and contained similar habitat. The plants at this site have been monitored for many years.

Center for Plant Conservation
  • 08/18/2021
  • Orthodox Seed Banking

In 2021, CPC contracted the Missouri Botanical Garden to recollect seed from a population currently held in long term orthodox seed storage as part of an IMLS-funded seed longevity experiment. The National Laboratory for Genetic Resources Preservation will evaluate how germination tested viability and RNA Integrity of seed lots decline over time in storage.

  • 09/09/2020
  • Orthodox Seed Banking

Seed harvesting and storage

  • 09/09/2020
  • Seed Collection

Seed harvesting and storage

  • 09/09/2020
  • Propagation Research

Past and current research has been completed in the areas of: Determination of competitive ability and growth characteristics (Hemmely 1976, Baskauf and Eickmeier 1994, Snyder et al. 1994). Comparing traits of E. tennesseensis with other members of the genus that are widespread (McGregor 1968, McKeown 1999) Methods of propagation.

  • 09/09/2020
  • Genetic Research

Past and current research has been completed in the areas of: Determination of competitive ability and growth characteristics (Hemmely 1976, Baskauf and Eickmeier 1994, Snyder et al. 1994). Comparing traits of E. tennesseensis with other members of the genus that are widespread (McGregor 1968, McKeown 1999) Methods of propagation

  • 09/09/2020
  • Propagation Research

Past and current research has been completed in the areas of: Determination of competitive ability and growth characteristics (Hemmely 1976, Baskauf and Eickmeier 1994, Snyder et al. 1994). Comparing traits of E. tennesseensis with other members of the genus that are widespread (McGregor 1968, McKeown 1999) Methods of propagation

Nature Serve Biotics
  • 05/02/2017

Five extant populations endemic to the limestone cedar glades of the Central Basin of Tennessee. This limited, specialized habitat is threatened by rapid residential development of the area. Fire suppression has also restricted the spread of populations. On the other hand, the species has been successfully reintroduced in its native habitat and seems stable and possibly increasing.

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Five populations, individuals can range from 2,000 to 100,000 plants (USFWS 1989).

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Past and current research has been completed in the areas of: Determination of competitive ability and growth characteristics (Hemmely 1976, Baskauf and Eickmeier 1994, Snyder et al. 1994). Comparing traits of E. tennesseensis with other members of the genus that are widespread (McGregor 1968, McKeown 1999) Methods of propagation

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Establishing new populations in protected areas of existing cedar glade habitat. Attempts to purchase privately-owned land where the species is present. There are 3 colonies on state-owned land, and are managed by the State Divisions of Forestry and Ecological Services. These populations are zoned as restricted areas where no timber management is supposed to occur. The involved state divisions have also indicated willingness to assist with any habitat maintenance or experimental manipulations.

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Research and management needs include analyzing the role light and water have on population dynamics, reproductive biology and ecology and the affects of intra- and inter-specific competition.

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Seed harvesting and storage

Kimberlie McCue, Ph.D.
  • 01/01/2010

Threats include commercial and residential development, use of off-road vehicles, livestock grazing, hybridization with other Echinacea species and fire suppression (USFWS 1989).

MORE

Be the first to post an update!

Nomenclature
Taxon Echinacea tennesseensis
Authority (Beadle) Small
Family Asteraceae
CPC Number 1542
ITIS 37284
USDA ECTE3
Duration Perennial
Common Names Tennessee coneflower | Tennessee purple coneflower
Associated Scientific Names Echinacea tennesseensis | Echinacea angustifolia var. tennesseensis
Distribution Populations are distributed among three counties in Tennessee (USFWS 1989, Kartesz 1996).
State Rank
State State Rank
Tennessee S2
Ecological Relationships

Photos
Newsletters
Pollinators
Common Name Name in Text Association Type Source InteractionID
Bees
Honey bees Apis mellifera Confirmed Pollinator Link
Bees Suspected Pollinator Floral Link
Bumble bees Bombus Confirmed Pollinator Link
Bumble bees Bumble bees Suspected Pollinator Floral Link
Honey bees Honey bees Suspected Pollinator Floral Link
Bees Confirmed Pollinator Link
Bumble bees Bumblebees Confirmed Pollinator Link
Honey bees Uncommon honeybees Confirmed Pollinator Link
Butterflies & Moths
Butterflies Suspected Pollinator Floral Link
Butterflies Suspected Pollinator Floral Link
Sulphurs Colias Confirmed Pollinator Link
Brush-footed butterflies Junonia coenia Confirmed Pollinator Link
Whites Pieris Confirmed Pollinator Link
Butterflies Confirmed Pollinator Link
Skippers Anatrytone logan logan Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Argynnis (Speyeria) idalia Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Atrytone arogos Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Cercyonis pegala Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Danaus plexippus Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Hesperia dacotae Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Hesperia ottoe Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Limenitis archippus Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Oarisma powesheik Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Phyciodes tharos tharos Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Polites origenes Floral Visitor Link
Skippers Polites themistocles Floral Visitor Link
Brush-footed butterflies Vanessa cardui Floral Visitor Link
Metalmark moths Other bees Confirmed Pollinator Link
Whites Pierid butterflies Confirmed Pollinator Link
Sulphurs Colias philodice Confirmed Pollinator Link
Brush-footed butterflies Vanessa cardui Floral Visitor Link
Beetles
Beetles Confirmed Pollinator Link
Blister beetles Epicauta ferruginea Floral Visitor Link
Flies
Flies Confirmed Pollinator Link
Bee flies Bee flies Floral Visitor Link
Reintroduction
Lead Institution State Reintroduction Type Year of First Outplanting
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Tennessee Reintroduction 1970
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Tennessee Reintroduction 1982
Missouri Botanical Garden Tennessee Reintroduction 1985
Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Tennessee Reintroduction 1989
Missouri Botanical Garden Tennessee Reintroduction 1989

Donate to CPC to Save this Species

CPC secures rare plants for future generations by coordinating on-the-ground conservation and training the next generation of plant conservation professionals. Donate today to help save rare plants from extinction.

Donate Today